I think that's an area where we probably all can agree.. we can't afford to put all our eggs in one basket, as it were. We should be pursuing workable solutions on several different fronts, not waiting for the one, magic idea that will solve the problem overnight.

I believe all options should be left on the table. Let's not discard anything until it's universally understood to be unworkable, or unfeasible.

I just find it a shame that what I perceive as a corporate decision to make all the quick,easy money first, then worry about the future, may possibly put the country in a stranglehold down the road. Being in business for myself, I cetainly understand and appreciate how capitalism operates, however I have a problem when concern for the bottom line, or profit margin, impedes, or even halts progress. Especially when the ramifications are so far reaching, and will impact so many.


"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"

If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.