|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,695
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 03:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 16
Hall of Fame
|
|
Hall of Fame
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 16 |
Thanks for the reply, essup. My reasoning is really two-fold....cutting down on material and construction costs while still being able to remove the deepest (poorest) water first. I should have only one pipe joint inside the dam, and plan to use two anti-seep collars. I have no objections to the riser pipe being on the intake side, except for construction costs to facilitate removing the deepest water. Are there simpler methods of accomplishing that ?
"Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment". Will Rogers
"Don't let yesterday use up too much of today". Will Rogers
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|