|
Forums36
Topics41,133
Posts559,846
Members18,601
| |
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
13 members (Sunil, Tinylake, catscratch, michvis, Don Kennedy, Shorthose, Boondoggle, eivindml, N.C.PondJoe, SSJSayajin, Rick O, gehajake, Theeck),
757
guests, and
367
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 35
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 35 |
well I not interested in someone selling a product..I'm more interested in the guys on here that use it...i think it is appropriate for us to swap ideas to make sure we are all getting a fair deal..
Rufus Catfish
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 188
Member
|
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 188 |
Kelly,
The "unit" I reference would be 1/100 of a pound. Hence the cost per hundred units. I think we're both on the same wavelength but you stated the comparison better. Cost of the phosphate is what's important, discounting all of the other associated costs already discussed.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,488 Likes: 2
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,488 Likes: 2 |
Fishman - Thanks. I now understand your calculations. Different method, comparable results.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
