|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,700
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 03:05 AM
|
|
|
8 members (J. E. Craig, gehajake, FishinRod, WindowRock, jludwig, emactxag, Theo Gallus, LeighAnn),
3,304
guests, and
542
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,103 Likes: 24
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame  Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame  Lunker
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,103 Likes: 24 |
Outdoorsman, I would refuse to treat your pond with Alum if I were asked...it would be of no use for you...First, I seen NO colloidal clay in your water (merely stained water) and second, the high inflow of water would flush the alum out.
IMO, yes, an alum treatment would be a complete waste of time and money on your part.
Further, any time you treat a BOW with Alum, Add an additional amount of HYDRATED lime seperate of the alum, but at the same time for the safety in preventing a fish kill...the Hydrated Lime cost is tiny compared to the cost and time involved killing off, then replacing a mature fish population.
I will be documenting the clearing of two area ponds in the next couple weeks or so. One will also include removing large amounts of sediment prior to the Alum treatment.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|