|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,702
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Sep 20th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,001 Likes: 1499
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,001 Likes: 1499 |
IMO if your goal is just supplimental feeding then GFC is good for BG although the smaller GFC pellet size I think is larger than that of AM400. To get a little more value of AM use AM500($32-$34/50 lb = $0.68/lb) which is a pellet size similar to the smaller pellet of GFC. IMO BG in similiar conditions will grow faster and eat more on AM compared to GFC. A techincal study would have to prove the differences. Several studies have shown 32% protein is adequate for BG growth. Truth be known overcrowding and social structure balance of BG probably has more affect / influence on BG growth than the protein difference between GFC and AM.
If your pond is larger and you are feeding hundreds or a 1000+ pounds per year then cost could be more important depending on your fishery budget. Since I only feed about 150-200 lbs/yr then for me the cost difference is minimal.
Last edited by Bill Cody; 06/04/11 08:47 PM.
aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine - America's Journal of Pond Management
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|