|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,673
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,561 12 hours ago
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,300 Likes: 450
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,300 Likes: 450 |
Certainly, I defer to Bill's input.
I do have a curiosity to hear about someone's experience of having a single pike or musky (or a definite controlled number of the same) in a small pond.
I know one of our newer members has said he believes he has one pike in his pond, but I'm not sure he's certain that there's only one in there.
I know we also have another member in WV IIRC (that one's for you Theo) who has several musky who were feeding on an over-population of carp.
There's a slight novelty factor about having a pike or musky in a pond and I think that connects to an innate desire to treat the pond as a large aquarium. But I very much agree that such a scenario is not easily self sustainable regarding the predator/prey relationship.
Excerpt from Robert Crais' "The Monkey's Raincoat:" "She took another microscopic bite of her sandwich, then pushed it away. Maybe she absorbed nutrients from her surroundings."
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|