|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,695
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 03:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
Definitely FA, and you've got it bad alright. As others have mentioned, getting a head start on it is paramount to controlling it. If it's any small consolation, It was terrible in one pond of mine last year, so I got on it early this Spring, and now there's no sign of it. In the meantime, I agree with manual removal - a lot of work, but low cost, I used a fine mesh net and scooped it out when it drifted to shore on windy days.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|