|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,658
Members19,114
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
10 members (Dave Davidson1, dg84s, Pond Star, jludwig, Sunil, Theo Gallus, ewest, Terry Battisti, emactxag, Bill Cody),
2,134
guests, and
60
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,973 Likes: 1
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,973 Likes: 1 |
thanks, but I swear someone had posted something to the effet of "a bass should be 9 inches at 2 years and 12 inches at 3 yrs, etc." I remember thinking the fish were growing very slowly in that study but seems it came out of NY? I maybe way off but it was here somewhere.
Matt just wants to compare our collected data to something other than data we have from other clients. It for soure makes the client understand bass harvest a little better when you tell him his 11 inch bass is 6 years old.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|