|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,667
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
2 members (Theo Gallus, Knobber),
3,686
guests, and
162
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
I have fed AM500 since my fish were 3-4". Now that they are 8-9", I am wondering if I should switch to the slightly larger AM600. It seems to me that the HBG would expend less energy, and get full faster, by consuming a bigger piece of food. However, the difference seems so miniscule that I'm not sure if it would even be noticeable, as in faster weight gain and growth. I thought the larger pellets might "throw" better, since I feed by hand. But- my fish seem very tempermental,(downright moody), and don't respond well to anything that disrupts their normal routine. They are eating well, and I would hate to have to re-acclimate them all over again. Any thoughts?
Tony
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|