|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,707
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564
Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
7 members (Theo Gallus, FireIsHot, Sunil, ewest, CentexSaj, Jim Thompson, WindowRock),
2,587
guests, and
402
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 121
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 121 |
I have two lakes that are within 35 miles of each other. One of them has Florida bass and they are mostly stunted. The other has Northern bass that are in much better shape. The lake with the N. bass is 20 acres. I have been thinking about changing the genetic makeup of the lake containing N. bass by moving some of the stunted Fl bass to it. Now my question is if introducing stunted bass is a problem? My thought is that the problem with the stunted bass is a food deficiency not a genetic problem, so that this should accomplish my goal without causing a problem. Am I correct or am I missing something? Thanks.
Bill
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
|
|
