Originally posted by Mark Brown:
The company that quoted me says they have never had a failure with a pond or wetland using the ESS-13.
Mark,
I guess I'm skeptical by nature, but saying they are hitting 100% makes me wonder. I find it hard to imagine someone in the pond leak fixing business saying they have never had a failure. Since they are saying that, I would ask for a 100% Guarantee against any leaks. Are they willing to offer that guarantee?
I'm having trouble understanding why using clay isn't a viable alternative... you wrote, "There was very good marine clay that he saved during excavation for the dam." If good clay is available at the site, seems like that is a viable alternative.
If contemplating spending that much money, I think I would go for a second opinion..or even third opinion. Just my thoughts.
