|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,707
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,025 Likes: 2
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,025 Likes: 2 |
thanks, ya'll. not bigger than 20, Bill. seems mostly 13-14 and 1.5 lbs. stocked sept 08 as tiny ones from Keo. I found a striper chart going down to 12. Not sure how the larger ones would equate. Seems the hybrids are a little chunkier.
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
standard length vs. wt. chart
|
burgermeister
|
12/03/09 04:01 PM
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
Bill Cody
|
12/03/09 04:30 PM
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
burgermeister
|
12/03/09 05:37 PM
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
ewest
|
12/03/09 07:15 PM
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
george1
|
12/03/09 10:35 PM
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
ewest
|
12/03/09 10:57 PM
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
Bill Cody
|
12/04/09 02:40 AM
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
burgermeister
|
12/04/09 05:46 AM
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
Bill Cody
|
12/04/09 02:39 PM
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
ewest
|
12/04/09 03:14 PM
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|