|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,704
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564
Sep 20th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,025 Likes: 2
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,025 Likes: 2 |
Oops! RIght, Bill. Sorry about that. I will rename the topic. Looking for length vs. wt. standard for the species.
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
standard length vs. wt. chart
|
burgermeister
|
12/03/09 04:01 PM
|
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
Bill Cody
|
12/03/09 04:30 PM
|
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
burgermeister
|
12/03/09 05:37 PM
|
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
ewest
|
12/03/09 07:15 PM
|
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
george1
|
12/03/09 10:35 PM
|
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
ewest
|
12/03/09 10:57 PM
|
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
Bill Cody
|
12/04/09 02:40 AM
|
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
burgermeister
|
12/04/09 05:46 AM
|
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
Bill Cody
|
12/04/09 02:39 PM
|
|
Re: Wr, relative wt. for laymen, chart
|
ewest
|
12/04/09 03:14 PM
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
