|
Forums36
Topics41,074
Posts559,231
Members18,572
| |
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
14 members (BarbaraE, Boondoggle, Sunil, CentexSaj, Theeck, Jason D, FishinRod, JoshMI, CDB, catscratch, J. E. Craig, Theo Gallus, Bigtrh24, Chadsnider),
668
guests, and
440
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Ambassador Field Correspondent  Lunker
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 644 |
My first post claiming it as fake was prior to looking at the other 18 pics. Now I wonder a bit, but MAN, that first pic looks so questionable for many reasons. Just like Rainman said, the shadows, the lighting, the stance and the holding method just seem so obviously suspect that one has to question this whole thing regardless of the other "backup" pics. But why in the world would someone doctor one pic and submit 18 more that appear to me to be legit? Strange.....
12 ac pond in NW Missouri. 28' max depth at full pool. Fish Present: LMB, BG, RES, YP, CC, WB, HSB, WE, BCP, WCP, GSH.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,797 Likes: 14
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,797 Likes: 14 |
I saw this yesterday morning on my state's game and parks forum. Pretty cool and I do think it's legit from reading the article, comments, and viewing all the pictures. But, like many of you guys, I was very skeptical from that first picture.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
