|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,114
Posts571,690
Members19,115
| |
Most Online45,564
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,300 Likes: 450
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,300 Likes: 450 |
If cost is not a factor, I would go for it.
If you consider the ratio of a bass needing to eat 10 lbs. of fish to gain one pound of weight, you almost want to question the value of fatheads.
If you've got bass in there already, then most likely 90%+ of the fatheads will get eaten.
If there's no bass in there now, the fatheads may pull of a spawn next spring & summer to create a nice forage base to really amp up bass growth when bass are introduced.
Larger bluegill will also eat fatheads.
Excerpt from Robert Crais' "The Monkey's Raincoat:"
"She took another microscopic bite of her sandwich, then pushed it away. Maybe she absorbed nutrients from her surroundings."
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
|
|
