|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,676
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,561 22 hours ago
|
|
|
0 members (),
5,001
guests, and
226
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,355 Likes: 118
Editor, Pond Boss Magazine Lunker
|
|
Editor, Pond Boss Magazine Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,355 Likes: 118 |
My experiences with blues is that they will outgrow channels in their third or fourth years. Blue catfish are more predatory than their channel cat cousins, even though they eat fish food. Blues grow much larger than any other fish purposely stocked in a pond. I have seen blues larger than 50 pounds in medium-sized lakes. A fish so large will eat any other fish, including a four or five pound bass. If you stock blue catfish, prepare for their large sizes.
Teach a man to grow fish... He can teach to catch fish...
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Bluecats, an option?
|
davemc
|
11/18/06 01:58 AM
|
Re: Bluecats, an option?
|
Dudley Landry
|
11/18/06 02:24 AM
|
Re: Bluecats, an option?
|
davemc
|
11/18/06 02:35 AM
|
Re: Bluecats, an option?
|
Illinois Longhorn
|
11/18/06 08:20 PM
|
Re: Bluecats, an option?
|
Kodiak
|
12/08/06 02:23 AM
|
Re: Bluecats, an option?
|
Bruce Condello
|
12/08/06 02:59 AM
|
Re: Bluecats, an option?
|
Kodiak
|
12/09/06 03:50 PM
|
Re: Bluecats, an option?
|
Bruce Condello
|
12/09/06 04:02 PM
|
Re: Bluecats, an option?
|
Kodiak
|
12/09/06 04:57 PM
|
Re: Bluecats, an option?
|
Bob Lusk
|
12/10/06 05:35 AM
|
Re: Bluecats, an option?
|
overtonfisheries
|
12/13/06 05:18 AM
|
Re: Bluecats, an option?
|
big_pond
|
12/13/06 04:20 PM
|
Re: Bluecats, an option?
|
Texas Grey
|
12/24/06 04:08 AM
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|