|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,707
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
7 members (Theo Gallus, FireIsHot, Sunil, ewest, CentexSaj, Jim Thompson, WindowRock),
2,587
guests, and
402
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,285 Likes: 1
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,285 Likes: 1 |
Iowanate, I'm going to disagree with Blaine about deepening your slopes. Right now it looks like you're showing 5:1. Generally no steeper than 3:1 is recommended for safety reasons, it's very difficult to climb out of a pond with steeper than 3:1. I have two banks that are 3:1 and two at 5:1. I see no difference with weeds on either bank. For swimming, I find even the 3:1 difficult to climb out of. Keeping your slopes at 5:1 will save a lot of money on dirt removal that could go toward enlarging the surface area. The larger surface area will allow your pond to support more fish than deepening it. Mowing 3:1 is a little hairy too, 5:1 no problem.
 "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." Stephen W. Hawking
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|