Forums36
Topics41,070
Posts559,174
Members18,570
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
10 members (Augie, Sunil, Bill Cody, Snipe, bemdh8, rjackson, canyoncreek, Shorthose, Boondoggle, catscratch),
772
guests, and
472
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,801 Likes: 314
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,801 Likes: 314 |
I think the avenue of replacment cost of the actual fish of the same size is very, very solid, and not subject to questioning.
That's is probably a better route than I suggested because the time value to make a small fish into a big one is too vague to assign a monetary value.
Excerpt from Robert Crais' "The Monkey's Raincoat:" "She took another microscopic bite of her sandwich, then pushed it away. Maybe she absorbed nutrients from her surroundings."
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|