|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,707
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
7 members (Theo Gallus, FireIsHot, Sunil, ewest, CentexSaj, Jim Thompson, WindowRock),
2,587
guests, and
402
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,037 Likes: 483
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
|
|
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,037 Likes: 483 |
Eddie you were given the standard hatchery/fisheries science reply. That recommendation has developed because the experience of the industry is that LMB will overcrowd in a small pond WITHOUT MANAGEMENT and the customers will be unhappy and complain. They know most folks don't do much management and that results in problems. To avoid the complaints and blame the industry usually tells its costumers what you were told. There is only one difference IMO in LMB overcrowding in a .75 acre pond and a 5 acre pond. They both will be LMB crowded if unmanaged the only difference is the time it takes. Larger ponds take a little longer to reach that point.
PB has opened a new door to pond management. The key to quality LMB ponds is management not pond size.
BTW nice job with your pond. CC and HBG are a good put and take (fun and easy to catch) fishery. CNBG can work well also with a little management.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|