|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,676
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,561 18 hours ago
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 23
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 23 |
Greetings guys,
Its been some time since I have posted or worked with my pond but spring approaches and "fish days" at the local feed store are near. Last March I stocked my then newly built 1/3 acre pond in the Ozark foothills in SE Missouri with the state recommended 50% stocking rate (for a pond of this size) of 65 bg(2"-4"), 20 res(2"-4") and 2lbs of fhm. This was followed up in September by adding 17 lmb(2"-4"). By the onset of winter all of these seemed to be flourishing and there was no visible evidence of morts. However, after frequently reviewing Pond Boss boards and various other materials, I can not help but feel the stocking rates are too light. I understand state's reasoning with poor soil fertility, and I may have asked this before, but would I benefit by adjusting my stocking rates this spring?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,300 Likes: 450
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,300 Likes: 450 |
If anything, you did go light on the stocking for both forage and predators, but you might be just fine with that.
Personally, I would wait and see what you have this summer.
You will probably pull off a bluegill spawn this spring, and that could really help solidify your forage base.
I suppose there might be a slim chance of having a LMB spawn this spring which would also change the dynamics. If you could comment on how big the LMB are right now, we could speculate as to if they might spawn.
If the LMB don't spawn this year, but the BG and FH do, you might be good to go.
Excerpt from Robert Crais' "The Monkey's Raincoat:" "She took another microscopic bite of her sandwich, then pushed it away. Maybe she absorbed nutrients from her surroundings."
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 3
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 3 |
Much like Sunil said, you should get a good BG and RES spawn this spring. So those numbers will blow up! Depending on the size of your bass, you may get a LMB spawn but I think it is more likely you won't. I would recommend you keep an eye on if you see any LMB spawning. If you do, hold off on stocking. If you don't I would go ahead and stock another 15-20 LMB in the 6"-8" size. If you stock a smaller size of LMB say, the 2"-4" size, I would stock about 40 -50 as many will become bass food...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 325
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 325 |
Hey bus, welcome back. Sunil and CJBS have good advice.
LMB will catch up, they always do. I love the Greg Grimes super forage stocking strategy, but it doesn't fit for everyone. If I may, what are you trying to accomplish with the pond? What are your goals? How much will you fish it/manage it? Are you going to feed?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 23
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 23 |
Thanks for responding guys. I am a little embarrassed I had posted a similar message last fall. Sorry. I guess working two jobs and building a house can take its toll. In any case, the goal of my pond is to produce ample numbers of eating sized bluegill and I intend to fish/manage the pond extensively. Presently, I have no idea about the current size of the bass, however, based upon several nests, it appeared as if there was a limited bluegill spawn last year and the fatheads seemed to be prolific. What has really confused me is the state recommends a 5:1 ratio of bg:lmb (50% stocking rate) while many other sources recommend a 10:1 ratio. Also, is there any benefit to adding more fhm?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 14,676 Likes: 509
Moderator Lunker
|
|
Moderator Lunker
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 14,676 Likes: 509 |
10:1 BG:LMB tends to be more recommended (historically, not counting Grimes/Lusk new super forage ratios) down South. 5:1 is more common up North, where it can take LMB longer to achieve their first spawn and some folks worry about the forage getting too far ahead of the bass as a result. Either can produce a pond you can manage, especially in only 1/3 acre.
If your Fatheads are producing free minnows for you, stocking additional ones is IMHO a waste of $. Those FHM, in any numbers, will be wiped out by the bass in a couple of year at most. Spending money on fish feed to add size and numbers to the BG (and FHM while they last) is a better use of resources than adding more Fatheads.
"Live like you'll die tomorrow, but manage your grass like you'll live forever." -S. M. Stirling
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 3
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458 Likes: 3 |
If your goal is to produce nice sized BG to eat, go heavy on the LMB stocking and lighter on the BG. You'll end up with smaller bass, but the BG that survive will be a nice fat eating size and there will still be plenty of them to harvest for the table...
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|