Forums36
Topics41,013
Posts558,516
Members18,530
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
8 members (FishinRod, Theo Gallus, Angler8689, Sunil, Bill Cody, Theeck, Bigtrh24, Augie),
1,207
guests, and
311
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,365
Lunker
|
OP
Lunker
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,365 |
I recently ran across an old fiberglass sattelite dish, and am wondering if it would make good structure.
It's one of those king-sized dishes... must be at least 10' in diameter, and is very heavy. It's sort of a mustard yellow color, for better or worse.
With the huge bowl facing upward, the outer edges of the dish are 16-18" high. It makes a nice shady overhang that runs 3-4 feet beneath. Looks like an excellent hiding place for fish, and maybe a good horizontal surface for fathead to attach their eggs.
How about the huge yellow bowl? Should I partially fill it with dirt? Pea gravel? How about riprap? It may attract spawning bream, and they would be easy to see against the yellow background.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
bobad
|
03/29/06 02:42 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
JayMan
|
03/29/06 05:23 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
bobad
|
03/30/06 02:47 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
burgermeister
|
03/30/06 02:55 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Matt Clark
|
03/30/06 05:23 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Brettski
|
03/30/06 06:27 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Meadowlark
|
03/30/06 06:48 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
burgermeister
|
03/31/06 01:34 AM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Sunil
|
03/31/06 01:43 AM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Brettski
|
03/31/06 01:48 AM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Theo Gallus
|
03/31/06 02:02 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Matt Clark
|
03/31/06 02:05 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Brettski
|
03/31/06 05:16 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Bruce Condello
|
03/31/06 05:57 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Brettski
|
03/31/06 06:04 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
bobad
|
03/31/06 07:03 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
burgermeister
|
03/31/06 08:03 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Dave Davidson
|
03/31/06 11:04 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Brettski
|
03/31/06 11:57 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
donmorgan
|
04/06/06 07:09 PM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Eastland
|
04/07/06 12:56 AM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Bruce Condello
|
04/07/06 01:13 AM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Debra King
|
04/07/06 01:41 AM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Bruce Condello
|
04/07/06 01:46 AM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
ewest
|
04/07/06 02:18 AM
|
Re: Unusual Structure-- useful, or not?
|
Matt Clark
|
04/07/06 01:33 PM
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|