|
Forums36
Topics41,009
Posts558,459
Members18,527
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
10 members (LeighAnn, Brett B, jludwig, Pat Williamson, FishinRod, RobS, JKK, Jason D, Ponderific2024, Theeck),
1,148
guests, and
149
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,512 Likes: 270
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
|
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,512 Likes: 270 |
Twice is good with me. But this does prove a very good point. The speed of the internet and how far out in front the PB forum is.
I saw 2 science type articles (by people who are supposed to be up on all things fish) in the brand new In-Fisherman mag. - got it this week. One was about Round-up and frogs -old news and they didn't even report that it was not the active ingredient (GLYPHOSATE) that was the problem but the surfactant - they just took a cheap shot at the product. Second was they reported on a study that PFF reported on several mths. ago but they failed to state the obvious problems with the study and its attention grabbing conclusions. Anytime a scientist seeks attention by grabbing the media spotlight, waves a study around and starts yelling the sky is falling be careful. Real scientists don't work that way.
POINT -- THE PB FORUM WAS WAY IN FRONT OF THOSE GUYS AND GOT THE STORY (INFO) RIGHT.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BG sex?
by tim k - 05/12/24 07:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|