Forums36
Topics40,902
Posts557,128
Members18,452
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
16 members (jpsdad, rjackson, esshup, Boondoggle, jbird5986, Sunil, Rick O, Angler8689, anthropic, Justin W, Bing, bstone261, DenaTroyer, Theo Gallus, Shorthose, Freg),
959
guests, and
191
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 28,422 Likes: 794
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 28,422 Likes: 794 |
Agreeing with Bill here. When he says steep slopes, he's talking about as steep a slope as the soil type will support once you are a couple of feet under the waterline. Too steep of a slope above the waterline makes it almost impossible to walk around the edge of the pond, and too steep of a slope under the water line for the first 2'-3' of water depth will make it difficult for someone that may fall into the pond to walk out (clay is dang slippery when wet). Also, fish have a a hard time spawning on a steeply sloped pond bottom, so if you go that route make sure that there are some areas that are pretty flat in 2'-4' water depth (depending on clarity) for the fish to use as spawning areas.
We have done nutrient water testing of a pond prior and post bacteria application according to the mfg/supplier. We did not see a reduction of the nutrient level in the pond water to warrant the bacteria cost.
This was NOT a bacteria that works on reducing muck - this was in a nutrient heavy pond that was having algae blooms that limited visibility to less than 6" and there was blue green cyanobacteria forming in the pond.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|