|
Forums36
Topics40,965
Posts558,013
Members18,506
| |
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
12 members (Boondoggle, catscratch, canyoncreek, Jason D, Sunil, JoshMI, gautprod, Theo Gallus, Shorthose, rjackson, Bobbss, John Folchetti),
1,214
guests, and
192
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,499 Likes: 267
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
|
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,499 Likes: 267 |
As a general rule the more species present the harder it is to manage for goals. If all natural (put them in and see where nature takes it) is a goal then just go for it and see what happens. If you want trout as your goal then learn as much as you can about the species (especially food sources and reproduction) and set the pond on that course.
Assuming all natural is not your goal then I don't see how you manage all the mentioned species toward a goal of good trout pond. Way to many variables to get and maintain that goal.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
.gif)
