The studies posted by ewest are the same ones I used to have. Actually, they are the same ones that get presented everytime. Look at the dates when some were published, going on 50 years old or older.I wish someone would take a fresh look, with fresh experimentation. If the HBG are not prone to recruitment amongst themselves, nor are they likely to cross and backcross, where did the multitude of stories regarding reversion to GSF come from?


"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"

If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.