Forums36
Topics41,015
Posts558,532
Members18,532
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
8 members (catscratch, H20fwler, Brian from Texas, Bigtrh24, Jason D, GunBoss, FishinRod, Boondoggle),
862
guests, and
194
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15
Ambassador Lunker
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15 |
These days I tend to use Wr as an indicator of habitat. I still get a charge out of a bluegill over 150%, but I get a bigger thrill from seeing several fish at 135%. There will always be shooters and under performers within a population, so I look for an average. If I can establish that, I may then cull the underachievers no matter what Wr they are....if they can't make the average.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
BG sex?
by Bill Cody - 05/16/24 08:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|