Forums36
Topics40,991
Posts558,282
Members18,517
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
17 members (Augie, highflyer, Custom 68, Shorthose, esshup, Bigtrh24, FishinRod, tlogan, Theo Gallus, Sunil, Theeck, DrewSh, Dave Davidson1, tylerd1994, canyoncreek, bmo, BarkyDoos),
1,010
guests, and
211
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,488 Likes: 2
Lunker
|
Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,488 Likes: 2 |
I'm baffled too. A 24-oz application of flumi to a .8 surface-acre pond with water-pH7 should demolish watermeal. Likewise, 2x45ppb sequential doses of fluridone should yield reasonably decent reduction of watermeal unless notable water-exchanges occurred during or shortly after either treatment. What specific methods did you use to conduct both applications? Would you post a close-up photo of some watermeal spread across your palm, as well as a wide-angle photo of the pond? 0.8 Acres, 4 feet average depth. Moderate-heavy flow with rainfall, otherwise flow is minimal. rainfall events are problematic with fluoridone) Spraying clipper w/ Li700 24 oz Clipper was usual dose Sorry I wrote that wrong I was using Sonar AS, switched to Genesis to see if there were any different results, none. Doing 2 - 45 ppb treatments (.75 gal) AS was previously 2 - 45ppb treatments as well. Also no SAV in pond to soak up fluoridone. Btw there is an added surfactant in genesis that is supposed to enhance fluoridone effectiveness- I have seen this on other ponds. I'm stumped!
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|
|
My First
by H20fwler - 05/06/24 04:29 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|