Forums36
Topics41,000
Posts558,365
Members18,522
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
6 members (John Fitzgerald, RobS, FireIsHot, FishinRod, phinfan, Dave Davidson1),
1,017
guests, and
177
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 104
|
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 104 |
I have nothing to sell you and I am not an expert but I do have a few observations/questions that may help. Plus I can't sleep tonight The "muck" is made up of how much organic material? Beneficial Bacterias, like the brands you mentioned, only work on organic materials. So, if most of your "muck" was made up of inorganic materials, beneficial bacteria would be a waste of your money. If I'm viewing the picture correctly there seems to be a good slope. Is that correct? How old is the pond?
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
DCQuarterCircle
|
01/31/17 06:22 AM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
MNFISH2
|
01/31/17 09:22 AM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
Bill Cody
|
01/31/17 04:11 PM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
MNFISH2
|
01/31/17 07:04 PM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
4CornersPuddle
|
01/31/17 05:16 PM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
DCQuarterCircle
|
02/04/17 07:00 PM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
Bill Cody
|
02/04/17 07:30 PM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
DCQuarterCircle
|
02/04/17 09:47 PM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
Bill Cody
|
02/05/17 02:22 AM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
wbuffetjr
|
02/05/17 01:18 PM
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|