Forums36
Topics40,988
Posts558,233
Members18,514
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
10 members (x101airborne, pebaugh, KiwiGuy, B storm, Sunil, Mainer, Meandvls, JKK, Knobber, DrewSh),
1,017
guests, and
159
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15
Ambassador Lunker
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15 |
There is a growing governmental presence at the federal level, regarding private and public water. It's been a contentious topic here on the forum in the past, and while my personal view holds that the time is not yet right, I'm sure there will be further "testing of the waters", so to speak.
You are familiar with WOTUS?
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
My First
by x101airborne - 05/04/24 05:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|