Forums36
Topics41,006
Posts558,430
Members18,526
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
8 members (Ben Davis, Theo Gallus, BamaBass9, DrewSh, Sunil, Dave Davidson1, Pat Williamson, Stressless),
1,104
guests, and
161
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15
Ambassador Lunker
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15 |
I've been thinking for a few weeks now about the notion of absolutes. It seems to me that many aspects of fish and pond management once regarded as infallible truths may actually be open to much interpretation and implementation.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
BG sex?
by tim k - 05/12/24 07:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|