Forums36
Topics41,010
Posts558,487
Members18,529
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
11 members (BamaBass9, Justin W, Augie, JasonInOhio, Theo Gallus, cjschuhmann, catscratch, highflyer, Tinylake, Don Kennedy, Stressless),
1,173
guests, and
507
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15
Ambassador Lunker
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15 |
Anyone besides me find it a little sad that the forum has multiple threads running right now concerning liability, and the possible repercussions from misusing advice given over the internet?
I've said it before here...what the hell ever happened to common sense? Why must we continually lower the bar? When did it become allowable for someone dumber than a fencepost, to be able to blame someone else for their own mental shortcomings and lack of foresight??
We burn a lot. Never had an issue or a problem, thus far. Sure, things happen even to the best laid plans. But courting disaster by not knowing what you're doing is another story entirely.
People....America....just because you saw it, read it, or watched it done on YouTube, in no way qualifies YOU to do the same. It's seldom as easy, or as straightforward, or as legal, as it looks on the internet.
Why do we even need to explain that?
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|