Forums36
Topics41,019
Posts558,561
Members18,535
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
13 members (Sunil, FishinRod, Pat Williamson, Angler8689, Bill Cody, Drago, Theo Gallus, canyoncreek, Bigtrh24, Seyahmit, Theeck, Jake D., Boondoggle),
665
guests, and
264
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15
Ambassador Lunker
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15 |
It's refreshing to actually know the real-life explanations once in awhile. No guessing about unforeseen high water events, anglers with a bucket, or fish transporting birds. Nothing nefarious at all. A simple, human mistake.
Sounds like no damage whatsoever, so all is good.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BG sex?
by Bill Cody - 05/16/24 08:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|