Forums36
Topics40,964
Posts558,008
Members18,506
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
10 members (Don Kennedy, Theo Gallus, Bigtrh24, Rick O, Sunil, SetterGuy, Dave Davidson1, catscratch, Boondoggle, jmartin),
1,029
guests, and
173
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15
Ambassador Lunker
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15 |
Shorty, I think your efforts with your RES are to be commended. I've found your insights into their behavior, all the time spent studying external cues in regards to differentiating the sexes, and your ability to pattern them where angling efforts are concerned, quite thought provoking and informative. I appreciate you sharing the results.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|