Forums36
Topics40,964
Posts558,008
Members18,506
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
11 members (Sunil, Boondoggle, canyoncreek, Dave Davidson1, esshup, bmicek, Don Kennedy, Theo Gallus, Bigtrh24, Rick O, SetterGuy),
1,069
guests, and
163
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,973
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,973 |
Eric absoutely an amazing post. Should go in hall of fame posts.
We have had some questions about electrofishing effectiveness so I finally broke down and got a conducitivyt meter. Around here if the pond is not too muddy or turbid with phyto bloom I can guess with good acuracy the alkalinity based on the conductivty results.
Not scientific but I have two reagents for alkalinity I use the more accurate when I see a low conducivity b/c in 90% of cases the alk is low. IN coantrast when conducivity is higher than I normally see I use less accurate reagent. It has been useful for that as well as something we report along with shock results.
So dave I would caution the conclusions (jest of EW post) but with expereince in local waters cond would serve as indicator in some situations of hardness and alkalinity IMHO.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|