Forums36
Topics41,009
Posts558,438
Members18,526
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
10 members (Lina, Boondoggle, Kirrb, Theo Gallus, Fishing Norman, catscratch, Layne, Pat Williamson, liquidsquid, cb100),
1,109
guests, and
170
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15
Ambassador Lunker
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15 |
Ok guys, caught a nice 9.25" BG & it weighed 1lb5oz. My scale was right on with Bills method of checking the accuracy of the scale. Caught a cc that 2lb15oz so I know the scale was reading right. A 9.25" BG that weighs 21 ozs would feature a Wr of 193%. I mean no disrespect JD, but that female gill in your photo just doesn't look like it has the stuff to pull off that kind of weight. Are there any other photos of the fish, one that shows more detail as well as the entire length? Really curious!
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|
|
BG sex?
by tim k - 05/12/24 07:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|