Forums36
Topics40,964
Posts558,008
Members18,506
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
10 members (Sunil, bmicek, Don Kennedy, Theo Gallus, Bigtrh24, Rick O, SetterGuy, Dave Davidson1, catscratch, Boondoggle),
1,026
guests, and
167
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,058 Likes: 7
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,058 Likes: 7 |
It seems that the gypsum works slower and dissolves slower than the alum. It is less expensive and not as toxic but much more labor intensive due to the amount required. It hopefully will also add ca to my water which was very low. The bass fishing has improved dramatically. I caught over forty today on a green brush hog. The largest being just over three pounds. James where was your PH before you added gypsum? Just wondering why the choice of gypsum for your water chemistry. I personally do not like gypsum for water treatment for large body's of water or well water. It will effect the water permanently. Rarely will it give up the calcium ions that is why it is so safe. Cheers Don.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|