|
Forums36
Topics40,979
Posts558,159
Members18,511
| |
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
13 members (anthropic, nvcdl, bmicek, tim k, Sunil, Theo Gallus, Fishingadventure, DrewSh, papereater, FishinRod, bmo, Theeck, Shorthose),
1,044
guests, and
271
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,435
Ambassador Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
|
Ambassador Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,435 |
Travis, if those "yeses" are for me then you sound like you're in good shape. What I did in a very similar situation was have on 24" pipe that allowed about 1" of continuous flow
(which still allowed for a lot of extra water) and added another 18" pipe (set about 18" higher than the main pipe) and then the spillway - the spillway did get used a couple of times in spite of what I thought was "overkill" with the two pipes. The 2 pipes were about 50' apart on the dam.
Just do it...
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
