Forums36
Topics41,008
Posts558,434
Members18,526
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
7 members (Boondoggle, Theo Gallus, DrewSh, Pat Williamson, Ben Davis, FishinRod, Ponderific2024),
1,061
guests, and
167
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15
Ambassador Lunker
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15 |
I can't help you with the logo Krudell, but yes, you can still eat the fish as long as it's properly cooked.... no sushi.
The fish in my photos were consumed.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
BG sex?
by tim k - 05/12/24 07:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|