Forums36
Topics40,994
Posts558,310
Members18,518
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
11 members (esshup, Zep, Cliff76169, rjackson, Don Kennedy, tlogan, Dave Davidson1, Bigtrh24, canyoncreek, Sunil, Theo Gallus),
927
guests, and
245
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15
Ambassador Lunker
|
OP
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,980 Likes: 15 |
I guess the subject title about says it all. Is it possible to spot treat portions of my 2/3 acre pond for Sago pondweed, while maintaining aeration? I have been raking it out for over a week now, and can't tell any difference. I've got this stuff bad. All parts of the pond that are 5' or less have it on the bottom. It has reached the surface in a few spots, but mostly submerged.I posted earlier that I tried weedtrine D, but after 2 weeks there is little effect. I couldn't get the sprayed liquid down to the sago, so I'm looking into Hydrothol 191 granules, thinking they will sink down onto the pondweed. Is this a feasible idea? I know better than to kill off the entire pond at once, so how do you treat sections of it while maintaining aeration? Or do you? Am I out of luck? Thanks for any help.
Tony
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|
|
My First
by Bill Cody - 05/06/24 07:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|