Forums36
Topics40,963
Posts557,994
Members18,504
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 13,974 Likes: 277
Moderator Lunker
|
Moderator Lunker
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 13,974 Likes: 277 |
This may be over simplifying, but it seems like the 2 hp pump would use 2x the electricity and deliver not quite 2x the water (2hp:1hp and 50:27 gpm), while the 3 hp pump would use 3x the electricity for 2 2/3 the water (3hp:1hp and 80:27 gpm). If you are delivering the same amount of water over a 24 hour period, I think running the 1 hp pump would be cheapest.
I wonder if it would be possible to run a very small pump just to pressurize water for the house from the 1 hp pump feed to the pond. I've never heard of anything that that being set up. If possible, this should cost less than getting a 2 or 3 hp pump.
"Live like you'll die tomorrow, but manage your grass like you'll live forever." -S. M. Stirling
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|