I'm reading this with strong interest obviously it effects me to a high degree. However does anyone understand my point?
Weissguy you are perfect example through this little post you are thinking of changing of not stockign a bass that has resulted in wonderful growth and catch rates for my clients. If you read the above "the professor" is worried about things 20 years from now. Make sense.
Be aware of this current research but take it with a grain of salt and take time to understand how does this really effect my pond goals? We currently stock northern, F1 and Florida bass for clients and might emphasis this "mixing" more but to be scared of an F1 due to this limited knowledge could hurt clients overall goals I feel. Does anyone agree?
