Pond Boss Magazine
https://www.pondboss.com/images/userfiles/image/20130301193901_6_150by50orangewhyshouldsubscribejpeg.jpg
Advertisment
Newest Members
Shotgun01, Dan H, Stipker, LunkerHunt23, Jeanjules
18,451 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums36
Topics40,899
Posts557,071
Members18,451
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
Top Posters
esshup 28,411
ewest 21,474
Cecil Baird1 20,043
Bill Cody 15,110
Who's Online Now
14 members (Shorthose, Requa, Freg, DenaTroyer, Blestfarmpond, Snipe, RAH, Rick O, Justin W, bstone261, Theo Gallus, esshup, jpsdad, Bing), 748 guests, and 188 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#512894 10/18/19 03:41 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
R
RAH Online Content OP
Lunker
OP Online Content
Lunker
R
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
Have a pond with SMP and YP recruitment. What type of management (fish removal) is advised. Ten SMB from 10 to 16+ inches caught in a short period of time and released. Looking for a trophy pond for both species but SMP is priority.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 477
B
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
B
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 477
Cull your smaller SMB so remainder have plenty of food to keep growing. Next fall you should see some 17"-18" smallies.


aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine -
America's Journal of Pond Management
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
R
RAH Online Content OP
Lunker
OP Online Content
Lunker
R
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
Bill - Two others threw the hook and he said one was large. I caught one of the stockers 2 years ago that was 16". I asked that he call me the next time so that I can take some photos. What size cutoff do you suggest removing and how many per year in the 1 acre pond? I know this must be estimated based on very limited information.

Last edited by RAH; 10/19/19 05:48 AM.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,792
Likes: 68
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent
Lunker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,792
Likes: 68
I’d cull anything under 100 wr.


Many men go fishing all of their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after. ~ Henry David Thoreau

[Linked Image from i1261.photobucket.com]


Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
R
RAH Online Content OP
Lunker
OP Online Content
Lunker
R
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
They are all fat. Looking for a length so they stay that way.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 477
B
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
B
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 477
If you want to skew the SMB population toward larger individuals, then I would start culling those sizes that are most common and recruits from the original stockers. Remember as we leave behind the largest SMB those will trend toward hook shy and be harder and harder to catch as they age. You will definitely loose some of these oldest smallies due to deeply hooked fish and improper handling.

Based on the age of your pond and sizes of the oldest ones, I would be culling most of them from the newest year class and then some from the next older year class. As the year classes age their numbers decrease. Most likely this will be highest percentage culled from 6"-9" and then some from the 11" to 13" group. Return all 14"+ bass unless bleeding. This will "free up" more foods for the largest individuals and those remaining sizes so they grow optimally.

How many?. This will really depend on how abundant the smallies appear to be based on what is being caught by anglers. Your anglers should be accurately keeping track of all species caught, the fish length and lure used. Type of lure will bias the catch results. They record their catch as a return favor for you allowing them to fish. Tell them their efforts allow you to better manage the fishery so their angling is improved. Those unwilling to co-operate are suspect anglers and should not really be trusted and not allowed to fish.

My WAG for removal numbers from 1 acre starts with 8-12 6"-9" and 6-8 from 11"-13" group. We have to remember the smallies are usually not as prolific as LMB thus fewer numbers per acre than LMB.

Last edited by Bill Cody; 10/19/19 02:35 PM.

aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine -
America's Journal of Pond Management
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
R
RAH Online Content OP
Lunker
OP Online Content
Lunker
R
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
Thank you Bill. Just one trusted retired neighbor fishing. I will simplify to asking him to remove 10 6-10" and 8 12" since he is estimating sizes (if this seems reasonable). He understands that good management means more fun for him. He has been asked to remove 50-60 BG per year from our BG/LMB pond and recently saw the results when a friend from work caught a 6.4lb LMB which he kept along with 4 others 12" and under. Neighbor caught a bunch of nice BG in that same pond in early spring and kept some LMB under 12" as well to thin the herd. All were very fat which I credit very much to guidance received here and a lot of plant cover. It appears that the curly-leaf pondweed was not eradicated by the crayfish in the SMB pond and is doing fine in some spots without reaching the surface. It is much reduced from earlier years though. Is there any harm in adding the culled SMB to the BG/LMB pond? Don't want to screw up a nice pond. And as you guessed or remembered, I am interested in big but fewer number fish. Visiting kids can always catch and release a lot of BG and have plenty of fun. FYI - Neighbor is careful to lip hook the fish and get them off the line quickly when releasing them. I told him many released fish die after swimming away and to minimize time out of water. He is a very responsible guy.

Last edited by RAH; 10/19/19 03:36 PM.
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 477
B
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
B
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 477
Remember my numbers to be removed are a starting point and just my best guess based on not having sampled nor experienced the fishery. Angler catch records will indicate how well the culling is progressing as the pond and fishery ages which is why to keep catch records. Numbers and sizes caught per hours fished plus lure/s used. All these data items provide very important features about the fishery. These data allow for refining the removal numbers to achieve your goals of producing more numbers of larger SMB. It is good to have trustworthy and responsible anglers. I don't see a problem of moving some of the culled SMB to the BG-LMB pond.


aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine -
America's Journal of Pond Management
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 22
A
Offline
A
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 22
RAH it would be nice if you could get them to throw back th 6 pounders and only keep those smaller ones! 6.4 is big in Indiana.


A pond is like you job only way more important.
New PBM subscriber.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
R
RAH Online Content OP
Lunker
OP Online Content
Lunker
R
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
Bill - Thank you. Only fish caught in SMB pond was a single 16" SMB 2 falls ago (stopped fishing after that), a handful of 6-8" YP (not footballs) last winter, and the 16 SMB caught in two 0.5-1 hour sessions in the last week or so. I understand that your recommendations are WAGs with the limited information that I can provide, but they are better than anything that I could come up with. Will give the angler the option of keeping or relocation fish.

Last edited by RAH; 10/20/19 05:45 AM.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
R
RAH Online Content OP
Lunker
OP Online Content
Lunker
R
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
Andrew - The single big LMB was caught by a novice 60+ year-old angler in warm water and was really whipped by the time I recovered it from being tangled in lily pads (may not have survived anyway). The angler is a good friend and was really excited. I did not think removing that single fish would have a significant impact on a 1.25 acre pond. Would not want to have many of these removed per year though. Nice to know I have LMB genetics and conditions to produce fish like this.

Last edited by RAH; 10/20/19 05:45 AM.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Today's Birthdays
Bob Lusk, GaryK, GrizzFan, PhotographerDave
Recent Posts
Brooder Shiners and Fry, What to do??
by Freg - 03/28/24 09:42 AM
Alum vs Bentonite/Lathanum for Phosphorus Removal?
by DenaTroyer - 03/28/24 09:38 AM
Happy Birthday Bob Lusk!!
by esshup - 03/28/24 08:45 AM
Relative weight charts in Excel ? Calculations?
by esshup - 03/28/24 08:36 AM
Dewatering bags seeded to form berms?
by Justin W - 03/28/24 08:19 AM
Reducing fish biomass
by FishinRod - 03/28/24 08:18 AM
New 2 acre pond stocking plan
by esshup - 03/27/24 06:05 PM
1 year after stocking question
by esshup - 03/27/24 06:02 PM
Questions and Feedback on SMB
by Donatello - 03/27/24 03:10 PM
Paper-shell crayfish and Japanese snails
by Bill Cody - 03/27/24 10:18 AM
2024 North Texas Optimal BG food Group Buy
by Dave Davidson1 - 03/27/24 08:15 AM
Freeze Danger? - Electric Diaphragm Pump
by esshup - 03/26/24 09:47 PM
Newly Uploaded Images
Eagles Over The Pond Yesterday
Eagles Over The Pond Yesterday
by Tbar, December 10
Deer at Theo's 2023
Deer at Theo's 2023
by Theo Gallus, November 13
Minnow identification
Minnow identification
by Mike Troyer, October 6
Sharing the Food
Sharing the Food
by FishinRod, September 9
Nice BGxRES
Nice BGxRES
by Theo Gallus, July 28
Snake Identification
Snake Identification
by Rangersedge, July 12

� 2014 POND BOSS INC. all rights reserved USA and Worldwide

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5