Pond Boss Magazine
http://www.pondboss.com/images/userfiles/image/20130301193901_6_150by50orangewhyshouldsubscribejpeg.jpg
Advertisment
Newest Members
Bobc, SVacek, Tucker, Khmer, Shaner
15833 Registered Users
Forum Stats
15834 Members
36 Forums
36383 Topics
495789 Posts

Max Online: 1210 @ 08/23/18 11:01 PM
Top Posters
esshup 24032
Cecil Baird1 20043
ewest 19744
Dave Davidson1 13734
Bill Cody 12734
Who's Online
1 registered (anthropic), 64 Guests and 561 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
#490202 - 05/17/18 01:30 PM Testing meat for consumption
ImaBassMan Offline


Registered: 11/21/16
Posts: 5
Loc: Austin, Texas
We have a small lake in Central Texas and regularly keep and eat large mouth bass to control the population. We're starting to wonder if we should limit our consumption.

How can we go about getting the meat tested to see if its safe to eat and in what quantity? We're near Austin, Texas.

Top
#490234 - 05/17/18 06:32 PM Re: Testing meat for consumption [Re: ImaBassMan]
gully washer Offline


Registered: 01/07/13
Posts: 345
Loc: Texas
If you’re concerned about a possible concentration of toxins within the fish, perhaps a comprehensive analysis of the pond’s water would provide some answers. For a fee, Texas A&M offers water testing for the general public, and is probably your best option for a comprehensive analysis………Heck, they would probably analyze a fish as well, but that would most likely cost you a small fortune…….. Good luck!

Top
#490236 - 05/17/18 07:49 PM Re: Testing meat for consumption [Re: ImaBassMan]
gully washer Offline


Registered: 01/07/13
Posts: 345
Loc: Texas
Follow up: Out of curiosity I just visited the A&M website, and I'm surprised to learn that their lab does NOT test water or soil samples for pesticides or petrochemicals……… That leaves me wondering why an agriculture college wouldn't do so.

Top
#490238 - 05/17/18 09:33 PM Re: Testing meat for consumption [Re: ImaBassMan]
RAH Offline
Lunker

Registered: 05/17/09
Posts: 4283
Loc: Indiana, Boone County, 25 mile...
Scientists do tests for reasonable risks rather than for risks perceived to be significant by non experts based on web browsing.

Top
#490239 - 05/17/18 10:05 PM Re: Testing meat for consumption [Re: ImaBassMan]
Zep Offline
Hall of Fame 2014


Registered: 07/27/10
Posts: 3171
Loc: Dallas & Wills Point, Tx
gully....i would think a call to these folks in Denton, Texas might be worth seeing if they could point you in the right direction. It appears their tests are geared towards city water and well water, but they may know of something that could help you. What do you have to lose but a phone call.

"This is a valuable option that you should consider if your water comes from a lake or pond or from a well in an agricultural region"

https://www.purewaterproducts.com/products/wt004
_________________________
Fishing has never been about the fish....


Top
#490240 - 05/17/18 10:06 PM Re: Testing meat for consumption [Re: ImaBassMan]
Bill D. Offline


Registered: 10/19/14
Posts: 5779
Loc: Boone County Illinois
A call to your local health dept should provide you with contacts for the testing, if they don't already provide the service (mine does). What is your specific concern?


Edited by Bill D. (05/17/18 10:08 PM)
_________________________

You'll never know what ya can catch unless you wet a line!

Top
#490283 - 05/18/18 03:12 PM Re: Testing meat for consumption [Re: Zep]
gully washer Offline


Registered: 01/07/13
Posts: 345
Loc: Texas
Originally Posted By: Zep
gully....i would think a call to these folks in Denton, Texas might be worth seeing if they could point you in the right direction. It appears their tests are geared towards city water and well water, but they may know of something that could help you. What do you have to lose but a phone call.

"This is a valuable option that you should consider if your water comes from a lake or pond or from a well in an agricultural region"

https://www.purewaterproducts.com/products/wt004
Thanks Zep, that looks to be a really comprehensive test for a reasonable price.

Top
#490284 - 05/18/18 03:13 PM Re: Testing meat for consumption [Re: Bill D.]
gully washer Offline


Registered: 01/07/13
Posts: 345
Loc: Texas
Originally Posted By: Bill D.
A call to your local health dept should provide you with contacts for the testing, if they don't already provide the service (mine does). What is your specific concern?
Good suggestion, Bill, but I suspect the only people testing liquids in my little podunk county are the probation officers. lol

Top
#490299 - 05/18/18 07:57 PM Re: Testing meat for consumption [Re: ImaBassMan]
John Fitzgerald Offline


Registered: 10/27/15
Posts: 2141
Loc: S. end of Elkins, Arkansas
I wouldn't worry too much about it unless there is known industrial or heavy agricultural pollution in your watershed.

If it causes you to lose sleep, don't eat the fish.

Older, larger, bass tend to have more contamination than small, young, ones, to my understanding.

Mostly, the publicly posted cautions I have seen pertain only to children under twelve, and pregnant women.
_________________________

Top
#491231 - 06/04/18 09:22 AM Re: Testing meat for consumption [Re: Bill D.]
ImaBassMan Offline


Registered: 11/21/16
Posts: 5
Loc: Austin, Texas
My specific concern is I have a pregnant wife and young kids.

Top
#491266 - 06/04/18 04:23 PM Re: Testing meat for consumption [Re: ImaBassMan]
BrianL Offline


Registered: 03/31/14
Posts: 781
Loc: Paris, TX
You worry too much. It's fine, go fry some fish.
_________________________
1.8 acre pond with FHM(gone), CNBG, RES, HSB, and LMB
Trophy Hunter feeder.

Top
#491887 - 06/15/18 06:54 AM Re: Testing meat for consumption [Re: ImaBassMan]
Mfitzs70 Offline


Registered: 07/30/17
Posts: 51
Loc: Ottawa Lake , Michigan
Younger fish are better eating and will not have as many built up toxins or heavy metals. If your really concerned keep the big bass for catching and eat the smaller ones. Unless you right next to a fertilize dump you should be fine with the young fish.

Top
#491907 - 06/15/18 11:09 AM Re: Testing meat for consumption [Re: RAH]
Bocomo Offline


Registered: 05/06/12
Posts: 1181
Loc: Boone County, MO (pond)
Originally Posted By: RAH
Scientists do tests for reasonable risks rather than for risks perceived to be significant by non experts based on web browsing.


We also specifically don’t do them when we think the results might be used in some sort of legal dispute that we don’t want to be involved in...
_________________________
Our old pond project (updated 4/11/17)
+Donate ('17)

Top
#491916 - 06/15/18 01:42 PM Re: Testing meat for consumption [Re: ImaBassMan]
RAH Offline
Lunker

Registered: 05/17/09
Posts: 4283
Loc: Indiana, Boone County, 25 mile...
The tests are not optional, and are designed by experts in safety and health. There is a lot of misinformation on the web in all areas. Use Google Scholar to do your web searching and most of that misinformation is filtered out.

Top

Today's Birthdays
TATER, Web Pittman
Recent Posts
Pond builders in east texas
by anthropic
Yesterday at 11:41 PM
New Pond Owner...Need Some Advice
by MilkweedManiac
Yesterday at 11:07 PM
eurasian watermilfoil
by canyoncreek
Yesterday at 09:57 PM
Types of crayfish
by canyoncreek
Yesterday at 09:52 PM
Yet another fish species on Whatley's Pond
by Mike Whatley
Yesterday at 09:32 PM
Raising Black Soldier Fly Larva
by Mike Whatley
Yesterday at 07:57 PM
Drone footage of pond build - Livingston Co., MO
by s252101
Yesterday at 04:05 PM
Replacing my culvert
by dlowrance
Yesterday at 03:58 PM
Happy Birthday Smokey!!
by Flame
Yesterday at 03:40 PM
Walleye Egg-take underway in Kansas.
by jludwig
Yesterday at 02:37 PM
Newly Uploaded Images
Getting the Wood Puck houses done
Coon Pond Photos
Pond dig 3
Pond dig 2
Pond site
Pond dig

© 2014 POND BOSS INC. all rights reserved USA and Worldwide