Pond Boss Magazine
https://www.pondboss.com/images/userfiles/image/20130301193901_6_150by50orangewhyshouldsubscribejpeg.jpg
Advertisment
Newest Members
Shotgun01, Dan H, Stipker, LunkerHunt23, Jeanjules
18,451 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums36
Topics40,902
Posts557,113
Members18,452
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
Top Posters
esshup 28,417
ewest 21,475
Cecil Baird1 20,043
Bill Cody 15,112
Who's Online Now
9 members (anthropic, Boondoggle, Fishingadventure, phinfan, jpsdad, Brett B, catscratch, jbird5986, Freg), 644 guests, and 171 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8
B
bhh Offline OP
OP Offline
B
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8
Hi all,
I sent all this out to our DEC hoping they will approve this for a pond permit and I wanted to get some opinions on this site and whether you all think the DEC will approve. I was told I should hear back in 30-days.

There is a small unprotected outlet stream that flows through two upstream ponds of my neighbors and through what appears to be old pond site on my property. There is an old stone dam that no longer holds water although it will fill up for a few days after a big rain or snow melt as shown in the picture. In dry conditions however, there is just a small little brook that flows through the area. Any potential problems or any potential hiccup is because this stream flows into a protected Class A trout spawning stream that borders my property about 200-300 feet downstream from the existing stone dam.











What we are interested in doing is excavating the area upstream from the dam during dry conditions, enlarging and deepening it and then "repairing" this dam so that it will hold water, probably adding an earth or clay damn in front of it. We have a very reputable pond builder in the area that contributes to this site that I will reach out to perform the work if the site is approved.

One thing that makes me hopeful is a DEC forester was out at the property in 2014 and I casually mentioned the idea to him and he didn't see any issues but he was a DEC forester and now it is in the hands of the Permit office.

I'd love to hear some feedback on the site and opinions on whether or not this is a pipe dream.

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,979
Likes: 14
S
Ambassador
Lunker
Offline
Ambassador
Lunker
S
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,979
Likes: 14
I'm hoping for good news, but honestly expect the answer to be a flat out "no way". I anticipate federal involvement.


"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"

If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8
B
bhh Offline OP
OP Offline
B
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8
Thanks for the response and I appreciate your candor.

I'm curious what your opinion of the specific reason for the rejection would be. I know I have some wishful thinking going on here but the stream that I want to impound is NOT a protected stream and does not even show up on their (or any) map. I'm far enough away from the main stream that that isn't an issue (100 ft) and the waterway already has two ponds so the argument that an additional small pond would warm up the water really doesn't hold weight either. I'm pitching it as a restoration rather than a new project since there is an existing dam which would make adding a silt fence for the initial excavation very easy.

Why Federal involvement? The email back was:

Good afternoon (my name),

I will review this information and provide a response. These jurisdictional inquiries can take up to 30 days, although I try to get to them sooner.

Regards,

(name removed)
Deputy Regional Permit Administrator, Division of Environmental Permits

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,979
Likes: 14
S
Ambassador
Lunker
Offline
Ambassador
Lunker
S
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,979
Likes: 14
There is a growing governmental presence at the federal level, regarding private and public water. It's been a contentious topic here on the forum in the past, and while my personal view holds that the time is not yet right, I'm sure there will be further "testing of the waters", so to speak.

You are familiar with WOTUS?


"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"

If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
R
RAH Offline
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
R
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
I would wait and see, but my personal experience is that government bureaucracy has now impeded the efforts of private landowners to improve wildlife habitat. I say this as someone trying to convert over 100 acres of agricultural land to wildlife habitat. I may have to clear-cut woodland and start over to get around government appointee stupidity.

Last edited by esshup; 08/31/16 10:21 AM. Reason: removed political content
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 19
J
Offline
J
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 19
Better to just do it. Likely they won't find out. Looks like you could convert agricultural land by just failing to farm it. Claim physical or financial infirmity if challenged.

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 57
T
Offline
T
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 57
RAH, do like others, don't tell anyone you are looking at voting for the one that supports the people that worked so hard to get the money to build their ponds. smile bhh, I hope you can get er done.

Tracy


Do not judge me by the politicians in my City, State or Federal Government.


Tracy
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8
B
bhh Offline OP
OP Offline
B
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8
So I just read up on WOTUS. Complete and utter madness!

So what actually is going on behind the scenes of my request? Does the state agency have to reach out and get permission from the EPA/Obama administration for me to repair a dam on my own property? I mean the dam is ALREADY there. It just doesn't hold water any more.

Last edited by bhh; 08/31/16 08:33 AM.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
R
RAH Offline
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
R
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 281
"Complete and utter madness" captures it pretty well, also "sad".

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,712
Likes: 3
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,712
Likes: 3
Call your closest NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service) office. They are part of the US Dept. of Agriculture. They can be extremely helpful. They can give you a quick answer. Unless there are serious issues, they can help you navigate through the process. The biggest issue is impounding a stream. If you can find a way to divert some of the water, it will make permitting a lot easier.

Last edited by catmandoo; 08/31/16 06:28 PM.

Subscribe to Pond Boss Magazine

Peculiar Friends are Better than No Friends at All!
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1
Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1
When I look at the picture of the existing "dam," I don't see how it ever actually held water for an extended period of time. Are you sure it was not intended to just slow flood water which is more or less what it is still doing, if I understand correctly?


[Linked Image]
Be Brave Enough to Suck at Something New!
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8
B
bhh Offline OP
OP Offline
B
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8
@ catmandoo - thank you, I'll look into that for sure.

@ Bill D. - I don't really know if it ever really fully held water and there is some evidence it may have been a mill of some sort back in the 1700-1800's. There is so much sediment packed against the upstream side of stone "wall" however that it does seem to be holding an increasing amount of water and we do have fears of losing it at some point to a flood if it is not properly reinforced. It is a very cool part of history and part of our restoration plan is to salvage that in some way and make sure it is preserved for future generations to enjoy. My point to the DEC though is that it will continue to function in the same exact way since once it is filled, which will take about an hour or two, there will be a constant outflow that equals the inflow provided there are no leaks. Its the same way the two upstream ponds function as well.


Last edited by bhh; 09/01/16 10:51 AM.
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8
B
bhh Offline OP
OP Offline
B
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8
Thought I'd post a follow up. It took about 65-days but I received word from the NY DEC today that as long as we stay 50ft away from the larger protected stream, we're good to go!

Last edited by bhh; 11/02/16 01:26 PM.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Today's Birthdays
cro, HC1968
Recent Posts
Relative weight charts in Excel ? Calculations?
by jpsdad - 03/28/24 09:45 PM
pond experience needed
by jbird5986 - 03/28/24 09:39 PM
Alum vs Bentonite/Lathanum for Phosphorus Removal?
by FishinRod - 03/28/24 08:28 PM
New pond middle TN: establishing food chain?
by Bill Cody - 03/28/24 07:57 PM
Happy Birthday Bob Lusk!!
by FireIsHot - 03/28/24 07:33 PM
Working on a .5acre disaster, I mean pond.
by PRCS - 03/28/24 06:39 PM
Fungus infection on fish
by nvcdl - 03/28/24 06:07 PM
Can anyone ID these minnows?
by Dylanfrely - 03/28/24 05:43 PM
1 year after stocking question
by esshup - 03/28/24 04:48 PM
Yellow Perch Spawn 2024
by H20fwler - 03/28/24 04:29 PM
New 2 acre pond stocking plan
by LANGSTER - 03/28/24 03:49 PM
Paper-shell crayfish and Japanese snails
by esshup - 03/28/24 10:39 AM
Newly Uploaded Images
Eagles Over The Pond Yesterday
Eagles Over The Pond Yesterday
by Tbar, December 10
Deer at Theo's 2023
Deer at Theo's 2023
by Theo Gallus, November 13
Minnow identification
Minnow identification
by Mike Troyer, October 6
Sharing the Food
Sharing the Food
by FishinRod, September 9
Nice BGxRES
Nice BGxRES
by Theo Gallus, July 28
Snake Identification
Snake Identification
by Rangersedge, July 12

� 2014 POND BOSS INC. all rights reserved USA and Worldwide

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5