Pond Boss Magazine
https://www.pondboss.com/images/userfiles/image/20130301193901_6_150by50orangewhyshouldsubscribejpeg.jpg
Advertisment
Newest Members
Kanon M, KWL, Homestead 101, Willy Wonka, gautprod
18,494 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums36
Topics40,960
Posts557,934
Members18,495
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
Top Posters
esshup 28,534
ewest 21,493
Cecil Baird1 20,043
Bill Cody 15,145
Who's Online Now
3 members (Fishingadventure, Boondoggle, Jward87), 716 guests, and 190 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Seville #430164 11/26/15 11:03 PM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 368
T
Offline
T
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 368
I've been aware of the many concerns about Roundup since the time I worked for BLM, and I've read various things on the subject in the interim. To my mind, there's plenty of reason for concern, and I choose not to use the stuff. But it's still one of the most widely used (probably the most widely used) herbicides, so it's obvious many people don't agree with my take on the subject.
http://roundupcompensation.com/
http://earthopensource.org/gmomythsandtr...easier-farmers/
http://robbwolf.com/2015/05/06/glyphosate-benign-or-dangerous/
http://www.mindfully.org/Pesticide/Roundup-Glyphosate-Factsheet-Cox.htm
http://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/glyphogen.html
http://www.pan-uk.org/pestnews/Actives/glyphosa.htm

Seville #430166 11/27/15 06:04 AM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,722
Likes: 282
R
RAH Offline
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
R
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,722
Likes: 282
When I look at internet links the first thing I do is go the .edu or .gov sites. I went to the one link that you list that fits this category and it seems accurate. These types of sites cannot just write anything. Folks have many concerns that have no evidence to support them.

http://www.ufocasebook.com/alienabductions.html

As a scientist, I go with evidence over popular concerns.

Seville #430172 11/27/15 08:19 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,979
Likes: 14
S
Ambassador
Lunker
Offline
Ambassador
Lunker
S
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,979
Likes: 14
Come now. How can one compare the supposed danger of glyphosate to the very real possibility of alien abduction? I've said it before and I'll say it again, when the science experiment that is planet Earth comes to an end, there's going to be a lot of very surprised looks on faces. grin

You know how we manipulate the environment in order to raise our fish? Yeah well, that same technique works on a much grander scale also.. laugh


"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"

If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,722
Likes: 282
R
RAH Offline
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
R
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,722
Likes: 282
Alien abductions are a lot harder to disprove:) Supposed dangers of glyphosate can be tested in scientific experiments. Folks have been trying pretty hard for over 40 years to demonstrate the "dangers" of glyphosate with out much luck, but who knows what will pop up tomorrow?

RAH #430177 11/27/15 09:00 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,979
Likes: 14
S
Ambassador
Lunker
Offline
Ambassador
Lunker
S
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,979
Likes: 14
Originally Posted By: RAH
Folks have been trying pretty hard for over 40 years to demonstrate the "dangers" of glyphosate with out much luck, but who knows what will pop up tomorrow?


I like hearing you say that. I think there are many who are content in believing today's knowledge is the ultimate and final word on a subject. I try to always keep an open mind and continue to question.


"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"

If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.
Seville #440483 03/13/16 05:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1
Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1

In another thread, there is a discussion about High PH in ponds which I find a very interesting subject and I've been digging into it some. One thing I’m finding in my reading is that, although submerged pond vegetation increases DO, it is reducing CO2 at the same time which will result in an upward swing in PH; with the amount of the upswing dependent on several factors. My pond has High PH (8.3 to 8.4) already and very high alkalinity (250-300). I don't want to go from an "ok" PH situation to one with unacceptably high spikes in the afternoons just because I planted/allowed vegetation.

My questions:

1) Does emergent and/or marginal vegetation increase DO and reduce CO2 to the same degree as submerged?
2) I’ve been planning to try and get some submerged vegetation started for habitat and nutrient control. Is this a good idea, bad idea or “it depends” for my situation?”
3) Should I focus on emergent and marginal vegetation instead of submerged?

Any insight anyone can provide would be greatly appreciated!

Bill D.


[Linked Image]
Be Brave Enough to Suck at Something New!
Seville #440502 03/13/16 08:13 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 488
B
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
B
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 488
With high alkalinity - total hardness there is a high buffering capacity to resist 'swings' of pH. pH will swing up and down depending on sunshine (pH up); night (pH down). At night plants produce CO2 which converts to an acid (carbonic acid) to lower pH. In sunshine carbonic acid is converted to carbonates pH goes up. The amount of buffering and plant activity determines how much the shift will be. Significant shifts of pH are not a concern in your pond chemistry. With your hardness, I doubt very much you will ever see a pH decrease to 7.0 in your pond due to even abundant submerged plant growth. In low alkalinity water expect greater shifts of pH.

Last edited by Bill Cody; 03/13/16 08:38 PM.

aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine -
America's Journal of Pond Management
Seville #440509 03/13/16 08:36 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1
Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1
Thanks Bill. I will move forward with the plan, HOPEFULLY, get the desirable vegetation in place before the bad boys show up and takeover!


[Linked Image]
Be Brave Enough to Suck at Something New!
Seville #440520 03/13/16 09:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,386
B
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
B
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,386
PSA...Aliens have recently been reported to be hanging around elevator shafts.


Do nature a favor, spay/neuter your pets and any weird friends or relatives.
Seville #440527 03/13/16 09:36 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1
Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1
No worries Bob. I've seen the same reports. I suspect it's just Sparkie in his infamous fishing garb! grin


[Linked Image]
Be Brave Enough to Suck at Something New!
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,864
Likes: 298
A
Offline
A
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,864
Likes: 298
Originally Posted By: Bill Cody
With high alkalinity - total hardness there is a high buffering capacity to resist 'swings' of pH. pH will swing up and down depending on sunshine (pH up); night (pH down). At night plants produce CO2 which converts to an acid (carbonic acid) to lower pH. In sunshine carbonic acid is converted to carbonates pH goes up. The amount of buffering and plant activity determines how much the shift will be. Significant shifts of pH are not a concern in your pond chemistry. With your hardness, I doubt very much you will ever see a pH decrease to 7.0 in your pond due to even abundant submerged plant growth. In low alkalinity water expect greater shifts of pH.


Bill, I have the opposite problem: low alkalinity (37 last I checked) and low pH (around 6, even with lime on the bottom).

My pond is new with little or no plant life. Would water plants help me with the alkalinity/pH?


7ac 2015 CNBG RES FHM 2016 TP FLMB 2017 NLMB GSH L 2018 TP & 70 HSB PK 2019 TP RBT 2020 TFS TP 25 HSB 250 F1,L,RBT -206 2021 TFS TP GSH L,-312 2022 GSH TP CR TFS RBT -234, 2023 BG TP TFS NLMB, -160




Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Link Copied to Clipboard
Today's Birthdays
jeffreythree, ShortCut
Recent Posts
Inland Silver sided shiner
by Fishingadventure - 04/23/24 10:22 PM
Concrete pond construction
by FishinRod - 04/23/24 09:40 PM
Sealing a pond with steep slopes without liner
by FishinRod - 04/23/24 09:24 PM
Need help
by FishinRod - 04/23/24 01:49 PM
Howdy from West Central Louisiana
by FishinRod - 04/23/24 01:38 PM
Happy Birthday Theo!
by DrewSh - 04/23/24 10:33 AM
What did you do at your pond today?
by canyoncreek - 04/23/24 10:16 AM
Caught a couple nice bass lately...
by FishinRod - 04/23/24 10:08 AM
Considering expansion of DIY solar aeration
by ghdmd - 04/23/24 09:42 AM
1 year after stocking question
by Joeydickens93 - 04/23/24 07:21 AM
Horizontal vs Vertical (big bass)?
by catscratch - 04/23/24 05:34 AM
Newly Uploaded Images
Eagles Over The Pond Yesterday
Eagles Over The Pond Yesterday
by Tbar, December 10
Deer at Theo's 2023
Deer at Theo's 2023
by Theo Gallus, November 13
Minnow identification
Minnow identification
by Mike Troyer, October 6
Sharing the Food
Sharing the Food
by FishinRod, September 9
Nice BGxRES
Nice BGxRES
by Theo Gallus, July 28
Snake Identification
Snake Identification
by Rangersedge, July 12

� 2014 POND BOSS INC. all rights reserved USA and Worldwide

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5