Pond Boss Forums GENERAL QUESTIONS Property Projects & Construction EPA/Legal experts?

GOP subpoenas Obama regulatory officials on water rule

By Timothy Cama - 07/14/15

House Republicans moved Tuesday to force the Obama administration to disclose certain documents related to the development of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) major water jurisdiction rule.

The House Oversight Committee sent a subpoena on the rule to the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), which is responsible for reviewing all major federal regulations before they are issued.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) alleged in his subpoena that OIRA and its chief, Howard Shelanski, are illegally withholding from Congress documents that lawmakers have requested since a March hearing.

The EPA made the highly controversial rule final in May, asserting federal control for pollution purposes over minor waterways like wetlands and streams. Republicans charge that it gives the EPA power over the vast majority of land in the United States.

“The proposed regulation is highly controversial and Congress has a right to know how it was developed,” Chaffetz wrote in the subpoena, along with Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), chairman of the panel’s government operations subcommittee.

“The documents and communications that the committee requested will advance our understanding of the review process and the factors that OIRA considered during that process,” they said.

At a March hearing, Meadows pressed Shelanski to disclose all communications between the agency and the EPA on the rule. But Shelanski declined to hand over staff-level communications within his agency, saying that they are part of a “deliberative process” and Congress is not entitled to that information.

Meadows and Chaffetz have since repeatedly asked for that information, and Shelanski and his staff have refused, the committee said.

On the Senate side of Capitol Hill Tuesday, lawmakers sought other information from the Obama administration on the water rule.

Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, asked the EPA to send the committee its legal justification for the regulation.

“I have been waiting for over four months for a legal justification of EPA’s redefinition of ‘waters of the United States,' ” Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska), who chairs the subpanel with water oversight and signed onto Inhofe’s letter, said in a statement.

“Having reviewed the final rule, the reason for the delay is apparent — the final rule cannot be justified,” he said.

The House has passed a bill to overturn the water rule, and the Senate is working on a bill to for the EPA to go back to the drawing board on it.

Separately, more than two dozen states and numerous business groups have filed lawsuits challenging the rule.

Source: "The Hill"

No surprise with this.

All part of the reason I am not concerned over the rule. Nothing moves that fast in government. There are roadblocks and speedbumps, construction zones and potholes, lane closures and slower traffic, at absolutely every turn. Always something.

I'll worry when and if government begins to work together seamlessly. But not before.

Unfortunately that results in many causalities among common people !

Sometimes congress gumming up the works is a good thing!

I'm not overly concerned about this either even though I've personally seen my share of government oversight in the aquaculture industry. A lot of misinformation and the sky is falling mentality out there. And of course it's in the best interest of the media to make things look as negative and as bad as possible because that sells.

I even saw where someone was blaming the EPA for the wolf introduction out west in Yellowstone. The EPA had nothing to do with it. It was done by the Department of Interior upon request by local biologists due to the fact that the cervidae were overgrazing the park.

Wolves in Yellowstone system would not be a problem except they can't be effectively managed due to ESA listing.

They are building the S IN leg of I69 around Bloomington. Everywhere along the work zone, they have put up signs "Waters of the US" at every little ravine and holler. Guessing it was a requirement of federal funding. Don't know what the signs actually accomplish, but they are irritating.... can't imagine if that's your property next to the sign. Now why they also put up "Karst formation" signs, I have no idea- but those strike me as just silly.

Traffic through that I-69 construction area is almost indescribable at times.

What those signs accomplish, in my opinion anyway, is provide a job for someone on the taxpayers dimes. I highly doubt it goes any deeper than that.

Karst formation? Sure, anyone who lives around here knows that. You're right, that does appear kinda' silly?

That makes perfect sense Eric but the introduction still wasn't initiated by the EPA which was my point.

Or am I wrong?

Isn't a karst formation directly tied into the groundwater of the area? Maybe was done to make it clear that contamination had to be guarded against?

They are very watchful when it comes to Karst formations. Drop into a cave and discover those endangered, blind cave fish (see how I worked that angle into a pond forum? ) and you're done.


Whitish pink, fusiform shape, blind......now there's some forage!!