|
Forums36
Topics40,961
Posts557,950
Members18,500
| |
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
6 members (Boondoggle, catscratch, Ponderific2024, Fishingadventure, FishinRod, Snipe),
1,050
guests, and
140
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 17
|
OP
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 17 |
I'd appreciate any opinions on bubble tubing vs. a traditional diffuser; in particular something like the Vertex XL2SW - designed for shallow water applications such as 5-7 ft ponds.
Bubble tubing sounds like a great idea to me but I'm puzzled why it seems to not have been picked up by major aeration system manufacturers for shallow pond applications.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,099 Likes: 23
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame  Lunker
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,099 Likes: 23 |
Bubble tubing does pretty well in shallow water, up to 2 feet deep. The reason bubble tubing is not used by major aeration makers is that it is very inefficient. The bubble size is very large by comparison to membrane diffusers and the clog quickly...same as aquarium air stones.
The better bubble hoses have to be very precisely installed to work well...not good if you have fish or wind/wave action often relocating it.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,544
Hall of Fame Lunker
|
|
Hall of Fame Lunker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,544 |
Also prone to clogging and uneven bubble distribution
I believe in catch and release. I catch then release to the grease.. BG. CSBG. LMB. HSB. RES. ![[Linked Image from i90.photobucket.com]](http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k247/jmilczski/Fish/PBSubscribe.gif)
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
