Any prints, besides those I see that were made by hooves? I would think that a big cat attack might involve a throat wound, but I'm not very familiar with them.
Are you thinking that the injury in the photo was the cause of death, or that the animal was scavenged after its demise? It is curious to me that the ear is still intact, as I would imagine they would likely be easier to chew/gnaw on.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
That second pic shows some throat trauma....how big was the cow? Were the injuries confined to the head/throat area, with nothing else touched? How long has the animal been down? If it was a cat, perhaps it will return for another meal, although it looks like it didn't eat much to begin with.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
TJ, which one of us is going to be the first to ask if the animal still retained its tongue?
Nah......too much spilled blood for professionals.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
That looks like small scavenger work to me. Large predators and scavengers will usually feed from the rear and belly where softer tissue allows for easier entry to the carcass cavity. That cow could have been killed or seriously injured in the head area and attracted small scavengers after death or even before death. Any predator large enough to bring down that cow would have done much more serious damage than your pictures show.
I don't think this is the work of a large cat ~ they suffocate their prey by clamping down on the neck, but I've never seen them eat the side of the head and neck off. Unless a cat took down the cow and was scared off... then something else came along and scavenged. I'm with Shorty and Bob-O on that one....
I've seen video of bobcats taking down full grown deer. On the opposite side from the eye looks to be a cat print. Too small to be a Mountain Lion but maybe a bobcat...or a ranchers animal.
Were there any claw marks on the animals back or side? Possible from where the cat jumped on while the cow was alive and used it's claws to hang on?
Re: Prints in the dirt. Cats don't leave claw prints, just from the pads on their feet. If those ARE claw imprints at the end of the footprint, then it's a canine.
I agree with Sue, if it was a big cat, there's not enough meat gone (unless it was scared off right after the kill and it was another small predator/scavenger that did the eating that you see) and I've never heard of one eating the head first. Any other areas on the cow where the skin is broken besides the head/neck area?
Mountain lions will bit like that if u leave it the lion will proubly cum back for it than u can get them call ur dnr about it I was watching the game warden show to day and a mountain lion did the same thing to this guys goats had to get a permit from dnr that night the guy shot it with his shotgun and the lion even had a tracking collar on it .
I would look for other holes on the body, see if it's more a bite pattern or claw pattern. Like some said leave the body, setup a hunting camera and see what comes back.
Happened in the early AM within 100 yd of my neighbors house. (Deep in rural area.) It is my neighbors cow by the way. Cow found just around Daylight near 8am and was fine when he was feeding her last night.
Game Warden It appears from the looks off things the cow was grabbed by the throat and really did not go anywhere from there. The tracks could have been made from neighboring dogs since it did rain during the night. Possible some scavenging after initial kill by a dog. Warden believes being close to house what ever committed Kill could have spooked away. Search of land revealed Calf that had been killed to long ago to diagnose what happened. Owner Is an executive and does not keep accurate number of Cattle due to it being a hobby.
Let me make it clear there is not claw, puncture or any wounds found other than the head and neck.
My immediate reaction, when I saw the photos, was dogs. Maybe coyotes, but coyotes would probably have eaten a lot more. I also wonder how much the actual killer(s) ate. When that happens in this area the dogs basically run the cow to death, or near death, and then run off. Then the scavengers move in. That last case near us was a cow that was run to the point of breaking a leg. There were no marks on the cow. The owner had to put the cow down.
Neck on cow is stretched out like it had been pulled from the lower part of the throat near the shoulder after she was already down. Blood above the nose is probably where the flap was on the ground before the dog/cat grabbed what he had and left. It doesn't look like it came from the nose itself.
Throat area is very vascular, and there's little blood below the throat. This leads me to believe that the cow had already died and the heart wasn't pumping.
Big enough to take down a fully grown, 1000lb cow, with no other marks on the body....so the animal wasn't dragged or moved, meaning it died right there. All within 100 yds of the house, and the occupants heard nothing from either the animal in distress, the killer(s), nor the panicked animals in the rest of the herd.
To me, that speaks of a couple possibilities....since I doubt the animal would've succumbed peacefully while being attacked, AND it was big enough to provide at least some measure of resistance, I would think that it either died from some other, natural cause, and was scavenged later, or the occupants of the home are nearly oblivious, and probably wouldn't know it if a full blown marching band paraded through the pasture.....which gives me cause to wonder how many other details are missing from this picture.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
Big enough to take down a fully grown, 1000lb cow, with no other marks on the body....so the animal wasn't dragged or moved, meaning it died right there. All within 100 yds of the house, and the occupants heard nothing from either the animal in distress, the killer(s), nor the panicked animals in the rest of the herd.
To me, that speaks of a couple possibilities....since I doubt the animal would've succumbed peacefully while being attacked, AND it was big enough to provide at least some measure of resistance, I would think that it either died from some other, natural cause, and was scavenged later, or the occupants of the home are nearly oblivious, and probably wouldn't know it if a full blown marching band paraded through the pasture.....which gives me cause to wonder how many other details are missing from this picture.
With fewer words; Looks like a Bush Hog took a head slice.
Guys I think those are good guesses, but I believe they're both wrong. Everybody is missing the obvious. A piece of the cheek has been surgically removed.
I believe this cow is the victim of the Barbacoa Bandit.