|
Forums36
Topics40,991
Posts558,272
Members18,517
| |
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
2 members (tim k, H20fwler),
664
guests, and
187
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 44
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 44 |
I'm trying to decide how much water I'm loosing to evaporation and how much to seepage. I have a 2 1/2 acre pond. With no rain to speak of in a month how much evaporation (drop in level) can I expect? I'm sure there is a formula.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,154 Likes: 493
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent Lunker
|
|
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,154 Likes: 493 |
Mike - The weather bureau records or reports the "pan evaporation" rates usu. daily. These amounts indicate how much water will evaporate in your area each day. Keep track, add them up, and you got your evaporation total.
aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine -
America's Journal of Pond Management
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,488 Likes: 2
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,488 Likes: 2 |
Bill - here's a "crazy" theory that came to mind:
Would a calibrated cylindrical bucket, filled to a specified mark and then floated in a stabilized manner within the pond be a means of distinguishing evaporation from seepage?
After inserting a yard stick into the pond's bottom near the bucket (with the surface level marked on the yard stick), if the surface level on the yard stick drops by a greater degree than the original water level within the partially-filled (yet floating) bucket, the difference between the two fluctuations could be attributed to seepage while the drop within the bucket could be isolated strickly to evaporation. ???? (The reason for floating the bucket in the pond is so the water within it would replicate the pond water temperature.) Do you think this method has any merit? Kelly D
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 494 Likes: 1
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 494 Likes: 1 |
I definitely think that idea has some merit. This is assuming of course that the bucket does not create shade which will reduce evaporation from the bucket.... and any decrease wind effect in the bucket that may slow evaporation. Slight variances aside is certainly seems like it would be a decent starting point. Should at least give enough info to determine if there is a significant seepage.
Owner/Builder of Ottawa Canada's first official off-grid home. http://www.mygamepictures.com - Hosting your outdoor adventure, fishing, hunting and sports related pictures!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,488 Likes: 2
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,488 Likes: 2 |
The bucket's internal "mark" would be near its upper-lip, yet low enough to prevent turbulance from splashing additional pond water into the bucket. Obviously, the selected site would need to be isolated from wave-action (the absence of which may influece the relative rates of evaporation). KD
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
My First
by H20fwler - 05/06/24 04:29 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
