Pond Boss Magazine
https://www.pondboss.com/images/userfiles/image/20130301193901_6_150by50orangewhyshouldsubscribejpeg.jpg
Advertisment
Newest Members
Shotgun01, Dan H, Stipker, LunkerHunt23, Jeanjules
18,451 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums36
Topics40,899
Posts557,050
Members18,451
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
Top Posters
esshup 28,407
ewest 21,474
Cecil Baird1 20,043
Bill Cody 15,110
Who's Online Now
2 members (Rainman, Bobbss), 284 guests, and 147 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
#177917 08/08/09 08:08 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 359
D
david u Offline OP
Lunker
OP Offline
Lunker
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 359
I have a Ruger 22cal and a Rem 22-250, but would like something in between for 70-100 yard shots. There are houses nearby and the 22-250 is too loud. I have some varmits, some of which have plummage, that I can't get closer than 80 yards to. I'm looking at a .17 cal or .22 Hornet. Does anyone here know which is quieter. I won't be shooting it a lot, so ammo costs don't matter. I also don't reload, so a good factory load would be important..du


david u #177921 08/08/09 08:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
C
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
Offline
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
.17 MACH 2 is quiet and will do the job at 70-100 yards. I think it would be better than the .22 Hornet IMHO.

Also, take a look at the Ruger .204. It's just a tough louder than the .17 MACH 2 but will touch up VERY accurately out to 250 or so. I love it for coyotes and foxes since the hole it leaves is so small keeping the value of the pelt up.

Any of the above have quality factory loads...

CJBS2003 #177922 08/08/09 08:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 28,407
Likes: 788
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 28,407
Likes: 788
After shooting a .17 HMR, I think I'd go that route. I have a Mach II (Kimber) and while it's accurate, it isn't on the accuracy level of the HMR, and the HMR can reach out a wee bit farther, and has (or seems to have) less wind drift than the Mach II at 100 Yds.

The .22 Hornet has one advantage, it's reloadable if you reload, therefore, if you reload, it can be loaded for different power levels.


www.hoosierpondpros.com


http://www.pondboss.com/subscribe.asp?c=4
3/4 to 1 1/4 ac pond LMB, SMB, PS, BG, RES, CC, YP, Bardello BG, (RBT & Blue Tilapia - seasonal).
esshup #177947 08/08/09 10:26 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 13,938
Likes: 268
Moderator
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Lunker
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 13,938
Likes: 268
From my .22 Mag days, it's perfect on Groundhogs out to about 100 yards.


"Live like you'll die tomorrow, but manage your grass like you'll live forever."
-S. M. Stirling
[Linked Image from i.pinimg.com]
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 544
J
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
J
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 544
The .22 mag doesn't boast the accuracy of the newer .17 cals but from my shooting of both calibers at groundhogs the .22 mag is better medicine for them as it delivers more "thump" (big ballisticalatious word I don't expect experts here to understand) when you hit them in the body, should you not be a head shooting sniper type like many claim to be. My main focus it to kill the animal so I aim center mass mostly shooting off hand, the .22 mag out performs the .17 in that respect and is cheaper to shoot. I shoot CCI Maxi-Mag +V rounds in mine and it is an amazing gun.

My heavier varmint rifle is the venerable .222 Remington, to me they never built a sweeter caliber for the handloading woodchuck hunter.

esshup #178010 08/09/09 11:27 AM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 87
P
PFV Offline
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
P
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 87
 Originally Posted By: esshup
After shooting a .17 HMR, I think I'd go that route.


+ 1


"The doorway to freedom is framed in muskets"... Charleton Heston
PFV #178051 08/09/09 04:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 471
J
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
J
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 471
You can't beat the .17 hmr its one of my favorite guns.

jsand13 #178060 08/09/09 06:55 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,319
H
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
H
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,319
I have been shooting 22 stingers in my 10/22. Is this the hottest load made for a 22?


In Dog Beers, I've had one.
jsand13 #178063 08/09/09 07:02 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 396
G
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
G
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 396
Depending on how close the neighbors are, and how much the noise bothers them you could always get a rifle with a suppressor (integral or screw on). I have a bolt action 22lr savage with a threaded barrel and suppressor. When I shoot subsonic rounds it is quieter than my pellet gun. Really, we measured the sound levels. It is also very accurate, and plenty deadly enough on small game. Besides, suppressors are fun, get one while you still legally can.

gallop #178067 08/09/09 07:35 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 705
R
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
R
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 705
Supressors are legal? Isn't that like a 'silencer'?

RobA #178072 08/09/09 07:58 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,902
R
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
R
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,902
Yes if you're willing to jump through the hoops to own one they're legal. But be aware you'll definetly be on the gov's radar.

I like the 17's. Flat, fast & Much less chance of a richocet.


Pond Boss Subscriber & Books Owner


If you can read this ... thank a teacher. Since it's in english ... thank our military!
Ric
RobA #178074 08/09/09 08:04 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 396
G
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
G
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 396
In most states, yes. Silencer is a misnomer, you can't totally silence any round, but we are talking about the same thing. Suppressors are very legal in Florida, just like full auto machine guns. Yes, full auto. It requires some specialized paperwork, some waiting time, and a background check, but that is about it. Only slightly more complicated than getting a concealed weapons permit. I am unsure of the laws of Pennsylvania, but a quick check with your local gun shop should get you the info you need.

My apologies to the OP for hijacking your thread

gallop #178075 08/09/09 08:09 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 396
G
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
G
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 396
Ooops. Ric beat me to it. As far as being on the government radar, I am already monitored by so many governemnt agencies with my current profession that it seems a moot point. Don't let that fact dissuade you from exercising your 2nd amendment rights.

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 705
R
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
R
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 705
 Originally Posted By: Ric Swaim
Yes if you're willing to jump through the hoops to own one they're legal. But be aware you'll definetly be on the gov's radar.


I don't want to be on anyone's radar. I use CB caps. Not very powerful but very quiet. Fits my minimal neeeds.

heybud #178093 08/09/09 09:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
C
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
Offline
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
 Originally Posted By: heybud
I have been shooting 22 stingers in my 10/22. Is this the hottest load made for a 22?


Aguila .22 LR Super Maximum 30-gr. HP at 1750 fps is the hottest .22 LR round out there. I use it in my 10/22 a good bit. Cycles the gun great, doesn't jam and is accurate for a high speed round.

JoeG #178094 08/09/09 09:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
C
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
Offline
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
 Originally Posted By: JoeG
My heavier varmint rifle is the venerable .222 Remington, to me they never built a sweeter caliber for the handloading woodchuck hunter.


My grandfather gave me his .222. I reload for it and it is VERY accurate. Under 300 yards it really is a tack driver.

CJBS2003 #178108 08/09/09 09:55 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,256
D
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
D
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,256
david and others,

I don't think it would be quiet enough for the needs specified in this thread, but I have been very impressed with the .204. Light, accurate, and packs a serious punch.


"Only after sorrow's hand has bowed your head will life become truly real to you; then you will acquire the noble spirituality which intensifies the reality of life. I go to an all-powerful God. Beyond that I have no knowledge--no fear--only faith."
davatsa #178112 08/09/09 10:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
C
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
Offline
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
 Originally Posted By: davatsa
I don't think it would be quiet enough for the needs specified in this thread, but I have been very impressed with the .204. Light, accurate, and packs a serious punch.


 Originally Posted By: CJBS2003
Also, take a look at the Ruger .204. It's just a touch louder than the .17 MACH 2 but will touch up VERY accurately out to 250 or so.


Good to see another liking the .204... It really is a great caliber.

CJBS2003 #178149 08/10/09 08:36 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,025
Likes: 274
D
Moderator
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Lunker
D
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,025
Likes: 274
CJ, I bought my Wife a Rem 222 about 20 years ago. Last year, she gave it to my 10 year old Grandson. He has taken 2 deer and one hog with it. We also reload for it but I haven't found much difference in any of the recipes.

If we are under 100 yards and have good shot placement, it is a great little gun. However, it doesn't provide a lot of shock. He shot a buck with it last year. A perfect heart shot at about 50 yards. The deer ran about 75 yards, turned around to look at what the noise was, and fell over dead. It never knew it had been hit.

The caliber has set a lot of records.


It's not about the fish. It's about the pond. Take care of the pond and the fish will be fine. PB subscriber since before it was in color.

Without a sense of urgency, Nothing ever gets done.

Boy, if I say "sic em", you'd better look for something to bite. Sam Shelley Rancher and Farmer Muleshoe Texas 1892-1985 RIP
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,365
B
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
B
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,365
 Originally Posted By: Theo Gallus
From my .22 Mag days, it's perfect on Groundhogs out to about 100 yards.


I second that.

Compared to other rounds with velocity of 2000fps and above, it's quieter, and has plenty of energy in the 40gr bullet. I've shot tough racoons at over 50 yards, and got nothing but humane kills.

I have an Anchutz bolt action in WMR. It easily shoots quarter-sized groups at 50 yards, and silver dollar sized at 100. (that's a hair over 1 MOA) So I think the round is inherently accurate. It may depend on ammunition brand, but probably not.

RobA #178152 08/10/09 09:07 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,365
B
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
B
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,365
[quote=RobA]
I don't want to be on anyone's radar. I use CB caps. Not very powerful but very quiet. Fits my minimal neeeds.

I tried those, and can't consistently hit a coke can at 30 yards. Don't you need a certain barrel twist to shoot those accurately?

bobad #178160 08/10/09 09:53 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 28,407
Likes: 788
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 28,407
Likes: 788
Because the bullet is so short on the CB caps, you probably need a slower twist barrel than the standard 1:16 that's in the normal .22 rimfire. The .22 that I had built to shoot the 60 g Aguila SSS shells has a 1:9 twist and it'll group 2" @ 200 Yds on a calm day. To do that, I had to have a 20 moa scope base. I can get is zeroe'd @ 50 Yds, and there is just enough elevation in the scope to get it to 200 Yds.

I believe the muzzleloaders that shoot round balls have a 1:32 or 1:48 twist.

The .22 WMR is a good round and has been around for a LONG time. The .17 HMR uses the same case, just necked down to .17. For distances of 70 to 100 Yds, the .22 WMR will do what you want as well, admirably. If your range estimation is off, the .17 HMR shoots flatter. I haven't checked prices on the ammo to compare them, but either will be cheaper to buy ammo for than the Hornet. My Mach II seems to be louder than my .22LR, but then again, I'm shooting standard velocity ammo in the .22, not the hyper velocity stuff.


www.hoosierpondpros.com


http://www.pondboss.com/subscribe.asp?c=4
3/4 to 1 1/4 ac pond LMB, SMB, PS, BG, RES, CC, YP, Bardello BG, (RBT & Blue Tilapia - seasonal).
esshup #178178 08/10/09 12:12 PM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 87
P
PFV Offline
Lunker
Offline
Lunker
P
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 87
The .22s are good, but to get one that will consistantly put 5 on a nickel, which is right at 13/16ths inch at one hundred yards you are gonna either have to get really lucky or spend a LOT of money. And it will almost certainly have to be a 22 mag.

The .17 HMR excells at inherent accuracy and flat trajectory.
And them lil' catridges look so dang cute to boot!


"The doorway to freedom is framed in muskets"... Charleton Heston
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
C
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
Offline
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Hall of Fame
Lunker
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,458
Likes: 2
The .222 is illegal for big game in VA and PA where I mostly hunt. I have only used it for ground hogs and predators and a few fall turkeys. I now mostly use the .204 for that purpose when I can steal it from my dad. I don't know if I got lucky but the .222 my grandfather gave me will shoot under 1" groups at 200 yards. It is definitely the most accurate stock rifle I have ever shot. Throw in the fact that it's probably fired a couple thousand rounds over it's 50 plus year life, it's pretty impressive!

CJBS2003 #178192 08/10/09 01:09 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 13,938
Likes: 268
Moderator
Lunker
Offline
Moderator
Lunker
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 13,938
Likes: 268
Well, you're an impressive guy.


"Live like you'll die tomorrow, but manage your grass like you'll live forever."
-S. M. Stirling
[Linked Image from i.pinimg.com]
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Link Copied to Clipboard
Today's Birthdays
Bob Lusk, GaryK, GrizzFan, PhotographerDave
Recent Posts
Happy Birthday Bob Lusk!!
by Rainman - 03/28/24 02:53 AM
Relative weight charts in Excel ? Calculations?
by Mark Dyer - 03/27/24 10:18 PM
Reducing fish biomass
by esshup - 03/27/24 06:17 PM
New 2 acre pond stocking plan
by esshup - 03/27/24 06:05 PM
1 year after stocking question
by esshup - 03/27/24 06:02 PM
Questions and Feedback on SMB
by Donatello - 03/27/24 03:10 PM
Paper-shell crayfish and Japanese snails
by Bill Cody - 03/27/24 10:18 AM
Brooder Shiners and Fry, What to do??
by esshup - 03/27/24 08:47 AM
2024 North Texas Optimal BG food Group Buy
by Dave Davidson1 - 03/27/24 08:15 AM
Dewatering bags seeded to form berms?
by esshup - 03/26/24 10:00 PM
Freeze Danger? - Electric Diaphragm Pump
by esshup - 03/26/24 09:47 PM
Newly Uploaded Images
Eagles Over The Pond Yesterday
Eagles Over The Pond Yesterday
by Tbar, December 10
Deer at Theo's 2023
Deer at Theo's 2023
by Theo Gallus, November 13
Minnow identification
Minnow identification
by Mike Troyer, October 6
Sharing the Food
Sharing the Food
by FishinRod, September 9
Nice BGxRES
Nice BGxRES
by Theo Gallus, July 28
Snake Identification
Snake Identification
by Rangersedge, July 12

� 2014 POND BOSS INC. all rights reserved USA and Worldwide

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5